OPPO A16K
$139
Compare Mobiles
vivo Y32 (2026)
$251
| A16K | Y32 (2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 251 |
| Battery | 4230 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 44 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G | UNISOC T7300 |
| Display | 6.52" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.87" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 112 cheaper
A16KUSD 139
vsY32 (2026)USD 251
RAM
1 GB more RAM
Y32 (2026)4 GB RAM
vsA16K3 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
Y32 (2026)128 GB
vsA16K32 GB
Battery
89% larger battery
Y32 (2026)8,000 mAh
vsA16K4,230 mAh
Charging
34 W faster wired charging
Y32 (2026)44 W wired
vsA16K10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A16KMediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Display
Larger120Hz
Y32 (2026)6.87″ · 120Hz
vsA16K6.52″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO A16K
Much lower purchase priceUSD 139
Smaller 6.52-inch display6.52″
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo Y32 (2026)
More RAM and storage4 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.87″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about OPPO A16K vs vivo Y32 (2026)
vivo Y32 (2026) offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than A16K, with 4 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 32 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 4230 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), NFC, and 44W charging. OPPO A16K, however, is around $112 cheaper, lighter at 175 g versus 229 g, and thinner at 7.85 mm versus 8.69 mm. The main trade-off is the Y32 (2026)’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the A16K’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
