OPPO A16K
$139
OPPO A16K vs OPPO F23
OPPO F23
$305
| A16K | F23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 305 |
| Battery | 4230 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 67 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Display | 6.52" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.72" • LTPS IPS LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 64MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 13 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 166 cheaper
A16KUSD 139
vsF23USD 305
RAM
5 GB more RAM
F238 GB RAM
vsA16K3 GB RAM
Storage
8× more storage
F23256 GB
vsA16K32 GB
Battery
18% larger battery
F235,000 mAh
vsA16K4,230 mAh
Charging
57 W faster wired charging
F2367 W wired
vsA16K10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A16KMediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G
vsF23Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
Display
Larger120Hz
F236.72″ · 120Hz
vsA16K6.52″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO A16K
Much lower purchase priceUSD 139
Smaller 6.52-inch display6.52″
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO F23
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging67 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.72″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about OPPO A16K vs OPPO F23
OPPO F23 offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than A16K, with 8 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 32 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 4230 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (64 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 5 MP), and 67W charging. OPPO A16K, however, is around $166 cheaper, lighter at 175 g versus 192 g, and thinner at 7.85 mm versus 8.2 mm. The main trade-off is F23’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus A16K’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
