OPPO A16K
$139
OPPO A16K vs OPPO A96
OPPO A96
$299
| A16K | A96 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 299 |
| Battery | 4230 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 33 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 |
| Display | 6.52" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.59" • LTPS IPS LCD • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 16MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 160 cheaper
A16KUSD 139
vsA96USD 299
RAM
5 GB more RAM
A968 GB RAM
vsA16K3 GB RAM
Storage
8× more storage
A96256 GB
vsA16K32 GB
Battery
18% larger battery
A965,000 mAh
vsA16K4,230 mAh
Charging
23 W faster wired charging
A9633 W wired
vsA16K10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A16KMediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G
vsA96Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
Display
90 Hz refresh
A9690 Hz
vsA16K60 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO A16K
Much lower purchase priceUSD 139
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO A96
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging33 W wired
Up to 90 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about OPPO A16K vs OPPO A96
OPPO A96 has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over A16K, with 8 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 32 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 4230 mAh, and a 90 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (16 MP versus 5 MP), NFC, and 33W charging. OPPO A16K, however, is around $160 cheaper, lighter at 175 g versus 191 g, and thinner at 7.85 mm versus 8.4 mm. The main trade-off is A96’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus A16K’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
