OPPO A16K
$139
OPPO A16K vs OPPO F35 5G
OPPO F35 5G
$440
| A16K | F35 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 440 |
| Battery | 4230 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 80 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G | MediaTek Dimensity 6360 Max |
| Display | 6.52" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.57" • Flexible AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 301 cheaper
A16KUSD 139
vsF35 5GUSD 440
RAM
2× more RAM
F35 5G6 GB RAM
vsA16K3 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
F35 5G128 GB
vsA16K32 GB
Battery
89% larger battery
F35 5G8,000 mAh
vsA16K4,230 mAh
Charging
70 W faster wired charging
F35 5G80 W wired
vsA16K10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A16KMediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G
vsF35 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6360 Max
Display
120 Hz refresh
F35 5G120 Hz
vsA16K60 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO A16K
Much lower purchase priceUSD 139
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO F35 5G
More RAM and storage6 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.57-inch
What CompareTab says about OPPO A16K vs OPPO F35 5G
OPPO F35 5G offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than A16K, with 6 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 32 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 4230 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 5 MP), and 80W charging. OPPO A16K, however, is around $301 cheaper, lighter at 175 g versus 205 g, and thinner at 7.85 mm versus 8.8 mm. The choice comes down to F35 5G’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus A16K’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
