OPPO A16K
$139
OPPO A16K vs Sony Xperia Ace III
Sony Xperia Ace III
$255
| A16K | Xperia Ace III | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 255 |
| Battery | 4230 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 18 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G |
| Display | 6.52" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 5.5" • IPS LCD • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 13MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 5MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 116 cheaper
A16KUSD 139
vsXperia Ace IIIUSD 255
RAM
1 GB more RAM
Xperia Ace III4 GB RAM
vsA16K3 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Xperia Ace III64 GB
vsA16K32 GB
Battery
6% larger battery
Xperia Ace III4,500 mAh
vsA16K4,230 mAh
Charging
8 W faster wired charging
Xperia Ace III18 W wired
vsA16K10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A16KMediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G
vsXperia Ace IIIQualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
Display
Larger display
A16K6.52-inch
vsXperia Ace III5.5-inch
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO A16K
Much lower purchase priceUSD 139
Larger 6.52-inch6.52-inch
Best if you want
More hardwareSony Xperia Ace III
More RAM and storage4 GB RAM · 64 GB
Larger battery4,500 mAh
Faster wired charging18 W wired
What CompareTab says about OPPO A16K vs Sony Xperia Ace III
Sony Xperia Ace III offers more RAM, storage and faster wired charging than A16K, with 4 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 64 GB of storage versus 32 GB, a 4500 mAh battery versus 4230 mAh, and 18 W wired charging versus 10 W. It also adds NFC. OPPO A16K, however, is around $116 cheaper and thinner at 7.85 mm versus 8.9 mm and has a larger 6.52 inch display. The main trade-off is the Xperia Ace III’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, and battery capacity versus the A16K’s lower price, larger display, and thinner body.
