OPPO A16K
$139
OPPO A16K vs Redmi A5
Redmi A5
$89
| A16K | A5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 89 |
| Battery | 4230 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 15 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G | UNISOC T7250 |
| Display | 6.52" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.88" • IPS LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 32MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 15 Go Edition |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 50 cheaper
A5USD 89
vsA16KUSD 139
RAM
1 GB more RAM
A54 GB RAM
vsA16K3 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
A5128 GB
vsA16K32 GB
Battery
23% larger battery
A55,200 mAh
vsA16K4,230 mAh
Charging
5 W faster wired charging
A515 W wired
vsA16K10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A16KMediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G
vsA5UNISOC T7250
Display
Larger120Hz
A56.88″ · 120Hz
vsA16K6.52″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareRedmi A5
Much lower purchase priceUSD 89
More RAM and storage4 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery5,200 mAh
Faster wired charging15 W wired
What CompareTab says about OPPO A16K vs Redmi A5
Redmi A5 has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over A16K, with 4 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 32 GB, a 5200 mAh battery versus 4230 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (32 MP versus 13 MP) and 15W charging. OPPO A16K, however, is lighter at 175 g versus 193 g and thinner at 7.85 mm versus 8.26 mm. The choice comes down to A5’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus A16K’s lighter, thinner build.
