OPPO A16K
$139
OPPO A16K vs vivo S2 FE
vivo S2 FE
$410
| A16K | S2 FE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 410 |
| Battery | 4230 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 44 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G | MediaTek Dimensity 7300e |
| Display | 6.52" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.83" • AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 271 cheaper
A16KUSD 139
vsS2 FEUSD 410
RAM
2× more RAM
S2 FE6 GB RAM
vsA16K3 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
S2 FE128 GB
vsA16K32 GB
Battery
136% larger battery
S2 FE10,000 mAh
vsA16K4,230 mAh
Charging
34 W faster wired charging
S2 FE44 W wired
vsA16K10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A16KMediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G
vsS2 FEMediaTek Dimensity 7300e
Display
Larger120Hz
S2 FE6.83″ · 120Hz
vsA16K6.52″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO A16K
Much lower purchase priceUSD 139
Smaller 6.52-inch display6.52″
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo S2 FE
More RAM and storage6 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery10,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.83″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about OPPO A16K vs vivo S2 FE
vivo S2 FE has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over A16K, with 6 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 32 GB, a 10000 mAh battery versus 4230 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 5 MP), and 44W charging. OPPO A16K, however, is around $271 cheaper, lighter at 175 g versus 224 g, and thinner at 7.85 mm versus 8.59 mm. The main trade-off is S2 FE’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus A16K’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
