Nokia 2.4
$139
Nokia 2.4 vs ZTE Blade A35e
ZTE Blade A35e
$89
| 2.4 | Blade A35e | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 89 |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 5 | 10 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 2 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 | Unisoc SC9863A |
| Display | 6.5" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.52" • IPS LCD • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 8MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 5MP |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 14 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 50 cheaper
Blade A35eUSD 89
vs2.4USD 139
RAM
1 GB more RAM
2.43 GB RAM
vsBlade A35e2 GB RAM
Battery
11% larger battery
Blade A35e5,000 mAh
vs2.44,500 mAh
Charging
5 W faster wired charging
Blade A35e10 W wired
vs2.45 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
2.4MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762
vsBlade A35eUnisoc SC9863A
Display
90 Hz refresh
Blade A35e90 Hz
vs2.460 Hz
Camera
Higher-resolution main camera
2.413MP rear
vsBlade A35e8MP rear
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareNokia 2.4
More RAM3 GB RAM
Higher-resolution main camera13MP rear
Best if you want
More hardwareZTE Blade A35e
Much lower purchase priceUSD 89
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging10 W wired
Up to 90 Hz display6.52-inch
What CompareTab says about Nokia 2.4 vs ZTE Blade A35e
ZTE Blade A35e has the larger display and faster wired charging than 2.4, with a 5000 mAh battery versus 4500 mAh, a 90 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 10 W wired charging versus 5 W. Nokia 2.4, however, offers 3 GB of RAM versus 2 GB.
