Nokia 2.4
$139
Nokia 2.4 vs vivo S2 FE
vivo S2 FE
$410
| 2.4 | S2 FE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 410 |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 5 | 44 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300e |
| Display | 6.5" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.83" • AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 271 cheaper
2.4USD 139
vsS2 FEUSD 410
RAM
2× more RAM
S2 FE6 GB RAM
vs2.43 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
S2 FE128 GB
vs2.464 GB
Battery
122% larger battery
S2 FE10,000 mAh
vs2.44,500 mAh
Charging
39 W faster wired charging
S2 FE44 W wired
vs2.45 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
2.4MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762
vsS2 FEMediaTek Dimensity 7300e
Display
Larger120Hz
S2 FE6.83″ · 120Hz
vs2.46.5″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceNokia 2.4
Much lower purchase priceUSD 139
Smaller 6.5-inch display6.5″
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo S2 FE
More RAM and storage6 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery10,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.83″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Nokia 2.4 vs vivo S2 FE
vivo S2 FE offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than 2.4, with 6 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 10000 mAh battery versus 4500 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 5 MP), and 44W charging. Nokia 2.4, however, is around $271 cheaper and lighter at 189 g versus 224 g. The choice comes down to S2 FE’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus 2.4’s lower price and lighter build.
