Nokia 2.4
$139
Nokia 2.4 vs Tecno Spark 50s 5G
Tecno Spark 50s 5G
$210
| 2.4 | Spark 50s 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 210 |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 5 | 45 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 |
| Display | 6.5" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.78" • IPS LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 71 cheaper
2.4USD 139
vsSpark 50s 5GUSD 210
RAM
2× more RAM
Spark 50s 5G6 GB RAM
vs2.43 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Spark 50s 5G128 GB
vs2.464 GB
Battery
44% larger battery
Spark 50s 5G6,500 mAh
vs2.44,500 mAh
Charging
40 W faster wired charging
Spark 50s 5G45 W wired
vs2.45 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
2.4MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762
vsSpark 50s 5GMediaTek Dimensity 6400
Display
Larger120Hz
Spark 50s 5G6.78″ · 120Hz
vs2.46.5″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceNokia 2.4
Much lower purchase priceUSD 139
Smaller 6.5-inch display6.5″
Best if you want
More hardwareTecno Spark 50s 5G
More RAM and storage6 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery6,500 mAh
Faster wired charging45 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.78″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Nokia 2.4 vs Tecno Spark 50s 5G
Tecno Spark 50s 5G offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than 2.4, with 6 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 6500 mAh battery versus 4500 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP) and 45W charging. Nokia 2.4, however, is around $71.00 cheaper and lighter at 189 g versus 210 g. The main trade-off is Spark 50s 5G’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus 2.4’s lower price and lighter build.
