Nokia 2.4
$139
Nokia 2.4 vs OnePlus 16
OnePlus 16
$844
| 2.4 | 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 844 |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 9000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 5 | 100 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 (SM8975) |
| Display | 6.5" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.78" • LTPO flexible OLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 705 cheaper
2.4USD 139
vs16USD 844
RAM
4× more RAM
1612 GB RAM
vs2.43 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
16256 GB
vs2.464 GB
Battery
100% larger battery
169,000 mAh
vs2.44,500 mAh
Charging
95 W faster wired charging
16100 W wired
vs2.45 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
2.4MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762
vs16Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 (SM8975)
Display
Larger185Hz
166.78″ · 185Hz
vs2.46.5″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceNokia 2.4
Much lower purchase priceUSD 139
Smaller 6.5-inch display6.5″
Best if you want
More hardwareOnePlus 16
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery9,000 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.78″ · 185Hz
What CompareTab says about Nokia 2.4 vs OnePlus 16
OnePlus 16 has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over 2.4, with 12 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 9000 mAh battery versus 4500 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 13 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. Nokia 2.4, however, is around $705 cheaper and lighter at 189 g versus 220 g. The choice comes down to 16’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus 2.4’s lower price and lighter build.
