Nokia 2.4
$139
Nokia 2.4 vs Alcatel One Touch Fire
Alcatel One Touch Fire
$89
| 2.4 | One Touch Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 89 |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 1400 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 512 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 | Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A |
| Display | 6.5" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 3.5" • TFT LCD • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 3.15MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 0MP |
| OS | Android 10 | Firefox OS 1.0.1 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 50 cheaper
One Touch FireUSD 89
vs2.4USD 139
RAM
253 GB more RAM
One Touch Fire256 GB RAM
vs2.43 GB RAM
Storage
8× more storage
One Touch Fire512 GB
vs2.464 GB
Battery
221% larger battery
2.44,500 mAh
vsOne Touch Fire1,400 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
2.4MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762
vsOne Touch FireQualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A
Display
Larger display
2.46.5-inch
vsOne Touch Fire3.5-inch
Build
81 g lighter
One Touch Fire108 g
vs2.4189 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareNokia 2.4
Larger battery4,500 mAh
Larger 6.5-inch6.5-inch
Best if you want
Lower priceAlcatel One Touch Fire
Much lower purchase priceUSD 89
More RAM and storage256 GB RAM · 512 GB
Lighter build108 g
Smaller 3.5-inch display3.5″
What CompareTab says about Nokia 2.4 vs Alcatel One Touch Fire
Alcatel One Touch Fire has more RAM and storage than 2.4, with 256 GB of RAM versus 3 GB and 512 GB of storage versus 64 GB. Nokia 2.4 counters with a larger 4500 mAh battery versus 1400 mAh, a larger 6.5 inch display, thinner at 8.69 mm versus 12.2 mm, and a higher-resolution 5 MP front camera. The main trade-off is the One Touch Fire’s extra RAM and storage versus the 2.4’s larger battery, larger display, thinner body, and higher-resolution front camera.
