Nokia 2.4
$139
Compare Mobiles
vivo Y32 (2026)
$251
| 2.4 | Y32 (2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 251 |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 5 | 44 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 | UNISOC T7300 |
| Display | 6.5" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.87" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 112 cheaper
2.4USD 139
vsY32 (2026)USD 251
RAM
1 GB more RAM
Y32 (2026)4 GB RAM
vs2.43 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Y32 (2026)128 GB
vs2.464 GB
Battery
78% larger battery
Y32 (2026)8,000 mAh
vs2.44,500 mAh
Charging
39 W faster wired charging
Y32 (2026)44 W wired
vs2.45 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
2.4MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Display
Larger120Hz
Y32 (2026)6.87″ · 120Hz
vs2.46.5″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceNokia 2.4
Much lower purchase priceUSD 139
Smaller 6.5-inch display6.5″
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo Y32 (2026)
More RAM and storage4 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.87″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Nokia 2.4 vs vivo Y32 (2026)
vivo Y32 (2026) has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over 2.4, with 4 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 4500 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), NFC, and 44W charging. Nokia 2.4, however, is around $112 cheaper and lighter at 189 g versus 229 g. The main trade-off is the Y32 (2026)’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the 2.4’s lower price and lighter build.
