ZTE Blade A56
$109
ZTE Blade A56 vs Nokia 6300 4G
Nokia 6300 4G
$69
| Blade A56 | 6300 4G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 109 | USD 69 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 1500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | N/A |
| RAM | 4 GB | N/A |
| Storage | 128 GB | 4 GB |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7200 | Qualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210 |
| Display | 6.75" • IPS LCD • 90Hz | 2.4" • TFT LCD • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 0.3MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 0MP |
| OS | Android 15 | KaiOS 2.5 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 40 cheaper
6300 4GUSD 69
vsBlade A56USD 109
RAM
4 GB more RAM
Blade A564 GB RAM
vs6300 4G0 GB RAM
Storage
32× more storage
Blade A56128 GB
vs6300 4G4 GB
Battery
233% larger battery
Blade A565,000 mAh
vs6300 4G1,500 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
Blade A56Unisoc T7200
vs6300 4GQualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210
Display
Larger90Hz
Blade A566.75″ · 90Hz
vs6300 4G2.4″ · 60Hz
Build
88 g lighter
6300 4G104.7 g
vsBlade A56193 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareZTE Blade A56
More RAM and storage4 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Larger 90Hz display6.75″ · 90Hz
Best if you want
Lower priceNokia 6300 4G
Much lower purchase priceUSD 69
Lighter build104.7 g
Smaller 2.4-inch display2.4″
What CompareTab says about ZTE Blade A56 vs Nokia 6300 4G
ZTE Blade A56 has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over 6300 4G, with 4 GB of RAM versus 0.5 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 4 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 1500 mAh, and a 90 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (13 MP versus 0.3 MP) and a higher-resolution front camera (8 MP versus 0 MP). Nokia 6300 4G, however, is cheaper at around $69 versus $109 and lighter at 104.7 g versus 193 g. The choice comes down to Blade A56’s extra RAM, storage, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution cameras versus 6300 4G’s lower price and lighter build.
