Samsung Galaxy A16 8GB
$199
Samsung Galaxy A16 8GB vs ZTE Blade A56
ZTE Blade A56
$109
| Galaxy A16 8GB | Blade A56 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 199 | USD 109 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | Unisoc T7200 |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED • 90Hz | 6.75" • IPS LCD • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 13MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 90 cheaper
Blade A56USD 109
vsGalaxy A16 8GBUSD 199
RAM
2× more RAM
Galaxy A16 8GB8 GB RAM
vsBlade A564 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Galaxy A16 8GB256 GB
vsBlade A56128 GB
Charging
15 W faster wired charging
Galaxy A16 8GB25 W wired
vsBlade A5610 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A16 8GBMediaTek Helio G99
vsBlade A56Unisoc T7200
Camera
Higher resolution
Galaxy A16 8GB50MP rear · 13MP front
vsBlade A5613MP rear · 8MP front
Build
More compact thickness
Galaxy A16 8GB7.9 mm
vsBlade A568.3 mm
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareSamsung Galaxy A16 8GB
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Faster wired charging25 W wired
Higher-resolution cameras50MP rear · 13MP front
Thinner body7.9 mm
Best if you want
Lower priceZTE Blade A56
Much lower purchase priceUSD 109
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A16 8GB vs ZTE Blade A56
Samsung Galaxy A16 8GB offers more RAM, storage and faster wired charging than Blade A56, with 8 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, and 25 W wired charging versus 10 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (13 MP versus 8 MP), and an ultrawide rear camera. ZTE Blade A56, however, is around $90.00 cheaper. The main trade-off is Galaxy A16 8GB’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, and camera features versus Blade A56’s lower price.
