Alcatel Pixi
$99
Alcatel Pixi vs ZTE Blade A56
ZTE Blade A56
$109
| Pixi | Blade A56 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 99 | USD 109 |
| Battery | 1300 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 5 | 10 |
| RAM | N/A | 4 GB |
| Storage | N/A | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM7227A | Unisoc T7200 |
| Display | 3.5" • TFT LCD • 60Hz | 6.75" • IPS LCD • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 2MP | 13MP |
| Front Camera | 0MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 2.3.6 Gingerbread | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 10 cheaper
PixiUSD 99
vsBlade A56USD 109
RAM
4 GB more RAM
Blade A564 GB RAM
vsPixi0 GB RAM
Storage
128 GB more storage
Blade A56128 GB
vsPixi0 GB
Battery
285% larger battery
Blade A565,000 mAh
vsPixi1,300 mAh
Charging
5 W faster wired charging
Blade A5610 W wired
vsPixi5 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
PixiQualcomm MSM7227A
vsBlade A56Unisoc T7200
Display
Larger90Hz
Blade A566.75″ · 90Hz
vsPixi3.5″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceAlcatel Pixi
Much lower purchase priceUSD 99
Smaller 3.5-inch display3.5″
Best if you want
More hardwareZTE Blade A56
More RAM and storage4 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging10 W wired
Larger 90Hz display6.75″ · 90Hz
What CompareTab says about Alcatel Pixi vs ZTE Blade A56
ZTE Blade A56 has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Pixi, with 4 GB of RAM versus 0.26 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 0.51 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 1300 mAh, and a 90 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (13 MP versus 2 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (8 MP versus 0 MP), and 10W charging. Alcatel Pixi, however, is cheaper at around $99 versus $109 and lighter at 118 g versus 193 g. The main trade-off is the Blade A56’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the Pixi’s lower price and lighter build.
