Xiaomi Poco C75
$109
Xiaomi Poco C75 vs ZTE Blade A56
ZTE Blade A56
$109
| Poco C75 | Blade A56 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 109 | USD 109 |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra | Unisoc T7200 |
| Display | 6.88" • IPS LCD Dot Drop Display • 120Hz | 6.75" • IPS LCD • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 13MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
RAM
2 GB more RAM
Poco C756 GB RAM
vsBlade A564 GB RAM
Charging
8 W faster wired charging
Poco C7518 W wired
vsBlade A5610 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Poco C75MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra
vsBlade A56Unisoc T7200
Display
120 Hz refresh
Poco C75120 Hz
vsBlade A5690 Hz
Build
11 g lighter
Blade A56193 g
vsPoco C75204 g
Camera
Higher resolution
Poco C7550MP rear · 13MP front
vsBlade A5613MP rear · 8MP front
Connectivity
Adds NFC
Poco C75NFC
vsBlade A56No NFC listed
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareXiaomi Poco C75
More RAM6 GB RAM
Faster wired charging18 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.88-inch
Higher-resolution cameras50MP rear · 13MP front
Best if you want
More compactZTE Blade A56
Lighter build193 g
What CompareTab says about Xiaomi Poco C75 vs ZTE Blade A56
Xiaomi Poco C75 offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Blade A56, with 6 GB of RAM versus 4 GB, a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz, and 18 W wired charging versus 10 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (13 MP versus 8 MP), and NFC. ZTE Blade A56, however, is lighter at 193 g versus 204 g. The main trade-off is Poco C75’s extra RAM, faster charging, smoother display, and higher-resolution cameras versus Blade A56’s lighter build.
