Samsung Galaxy M35
$293
Samsung Galaxy M35 vs POCO F9 Ultra
POCO F9 Ultra
$799
| Galaxy M35 | F9 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 293 | USD 799 |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 8050 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC) |
| Display | 6.6" • Super AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.9" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 506 cheaper
Galaxy M35USD 293
vsF9 UltraUSD 799
RAM
4 GB more RAM
F9 Ultra12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy M358 GB RAM
Battery
34% larger battery
F9 Ultra8,050 mAh
vsGalaxy M356,000 mAh
Charging
75 W faster wired charging
F9 Ultra100 W wired
vsGalaxy M3525 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy M35Samsung Exynos 1380
vsF9 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC)
Display
Larger185Hz
F9 Ultra6.9″ · 185Hz
vsGalaxy M356.6″ · 120Hz
Build
13 g lighter
Galaxy M35222 g
vsF9 Ultra235 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy M35
Much lower purchase priceUSD 293
Lighter build222 g
Smaller 6.6-inch display6.6″
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Ultra
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery8,050 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.9″ · 185Hz
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy M35 vs POCO F9 Ultra
POCO F9 Ultra offers more RAM and a larger battery than Galaxy M35, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 8050 mAh battery versus 6000 mAh, and a 6.9 inch display versus 6.6 inch. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 50 MP) and a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 13 MP). Samsung Galaxy M35, however, is around $506 cheaper. The choice comes down to F9 Ultra’s extra RAM, battery capacity, larger display, and higher-resolution cameras versus Galaxy M35’s lower price.
