Samsung Galaxy M35
$293
Samsung Galaxy M35 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| Galaxy M35 | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 293 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.6" • Super AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 406 cheaper
Galaxy M35USD 293
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
4 GB more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy M358 GB RAM
Battery
6% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsGalaxy M356,000 mAh
Charging
75 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsGalaxy M3525 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy M35Samsung Exynos 1380
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
185 Hz refresh
F9 Pro185 Hz
vsGalaxy M35120 Hz
Build
16 g lighter
F9 Pro206 g
vsGalaxy M35222 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy M35
Much lower purchase priceUSD 293
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Up to 185 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy M35 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro offers more RAM and a larger battery than Galaxy M35, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 6000 mAh, a higher-resolution 200 MP rear camera versus 50 MP, and a higher-resolution 32 MP front camera versus 13 MP. Samsung Galaxy M35, however, is around $406 cheaper. The main trade-off is F9 Pro’s extra RAM, battery capacity, and higher-resolution cameras versus Galaxy M35’s lower price.
