Samsung Galaxy M35
$293
Samsung Galaxy M35 vs Vivo Y36
Vivo Y36
$220
| Galaxy M35 | Y36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 293 | USD 220 |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 44 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 |
| Display | 6.6" • Super AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.64" • LCD • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 16MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 73 cheaper
Y36USD 220
vsGalaxy M35USD 293
Storage
2× more storage
Galaxy M35256 GB
vsY36128 GB
Battery
20% larger battery
Galaxy M356,000 mAh
vsY365,000 mAh
Charging
19 W faster wired charging
Y3644 W wired
vsGalaxy M3525 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy M35Samsung Exynos 1380
vsY36Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
Display
120 Hz refresh
Galaxy M35120 Hz
vsY3690 Hz
Build
20 g lighter
Y36202 g
vsGalaxy M35222 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareSamsung Galaxy M35
More storage256 GB
Larger battery6,000 mAh
Up to 120 Hz display6.6-inch
Best if you want
Lower priceVivo Y36
Much lower purchase priceUSD 220
Faster wired charging44 W wired
Lighter build202 g
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy M35 vs Vivo Y36
Samsung Galaxy M35 offers more storage than Y36, with 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz. It also adds optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and NFC. Vivo Y36, however, is around $73.00 cheaper, lighter at 202 g versus 222 g, and thinner at 8.07 mm versus 9.1 mm and supports faster wired charging at 44 W versus 25 W. The main trade-off is the Galaxy M35’s storage, battery capacity, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus the Y36’s lower price, faster charging, and lighter, thinner build.
