motorola Moto G73
$320
motorola Moto G73 vs Samsung Galaxy M35
Samsung Galaxy M35
$293
| Moto G73 | Galaxy M35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 320 | USD 293 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 30 | 25 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
| Display | 6.5" • IPS LCD • 120Hz | 6.6" • Super AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 16MP | 13MP |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 14 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 27 cheaper
Galaxy M35USD 293
vsMoto G73USD 320
Storage
2× more storage
Galaxy M35256 GB
vsMoto G73128 GB
Battery
20% larger battery
Galaxy M356,000 mAh
vsMoto G735,000 mAh
Charging
5 W faster wired charging
Moto G7330 W wired
vsGalaxy M3525 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Moto G73MediaTek Dimensity 930
vsGalaxy M35Samsung Exynos 1380
Build
41 g lighter
Moto G73181 g
vsGalaxy M35222 g
Build
More compact thickness
Moto G738.29 mm
vsGalaxy M359.1 mm
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactmotorola Moto G73
Faster wired charging30 W wired
Lighter build181 g
Thinner body8.29 mm
Best if you want
More hardwareSamsung Galaxy M35
Much lower purchase priceUSD 293
More storage256 GB
Larger battery6,000 mAh
What CompareTab says about motorola Moto G73 vs Samsung Galaxy M35
Samsung Galaxy M35 offers more storage than Moto G73, with 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, optical image stabilization on the main camera, and an ultrawide rear camera. motorola Moto G73, however, is lighter at 181 g versus 222 g and thinner at 8.29 mm versus 9.1 mm and supports faster wired charging at 30 W versus 25 W. The main trade-off is the Galaxy M35’s storage, battery capacity, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus the Moto G73’s faster charging and lighter, thinner build.
