Samsung Galaxy A50
$350
Samsung Galaxy A50 vs vivo X500 Pro
vivo X500 Pro
$903
| Galaxy A50 | X500 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 350 | USD 903 |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6510 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 90 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 9610 | MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro |
| Display | 6.4" • Super AMOLED • 60Hz | 6.36" • LTPO AMOLED (8T) • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 25MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 25MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 9 | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 553 cheaper
Galaxy A50USD 350
vsX500 ProUSD 903
RAM
2× more RAM
X500 Pro12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A506 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
X500 Pro256 GB
vsGalaxy A50128 GB
Battery
63% larger battery
X500 Pro6,510 mAh
vsGalaxy A504,000 mAh
Charging
75 W faster wired charging
X500 Pro90 W wired
vsGalaxy A5015 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A50Samsung Exynos 9610
vsX500 ProMediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
Display
144 Hz refresh
X500 Pro144 Hz
vsGalaxy A5060 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A50
Much lower purchase priceUSD 350
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo X500 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,510 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Up to 144 Hz display6.36-inch
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A50 vs vivo X500 Pro
vivo X500 Pro offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Galaxy A50, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6510 mAh battery versus 4000 mAh, and a 144 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 25 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 25 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and 90W charging. Samsung Galaxy A50, however, is around $553 cheaper and lighter at 166 g versus 192 g. The main trade-off is X500 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Galaxy A50’s lower price and lighter build.
