Samsung Galaxy A50
$350
Samsung Galaxy A50 vs vivo X500
vivo X500
$764
| Galaxy A50 | X500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 350 | USD 764 |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 90 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 9610 | MediaTek Dimensity 9600M |
| Display | 6.4" • Super AMOLED • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 25MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 25MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 9 | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 414 cheaper
Galaxy A50USD 350
vsX500USD 764
RAM
2× more RAM
X50012 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A506 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
X500256 GB
vsGalaxy A50128 GB
Battery
88% larger battery
X5007,500 mAh
vsGalaxy A504,000 mAh
Charging
75 W faster wired charging
X50090 W wired
vsGalaxy A5015 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A50Samsung Exynos 9610
vsX500MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
Display
Larger144Hz
X5006.59″ · 144Hz
vsGalaxy A506.4″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A50
Much lower purchase priceUSD 350
Smaller 6.4-inch display6.4″
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo X500
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery7,500 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Larger 144Hz display6.59″ · 144Hz
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A50 vs vivo X500
vivo X500 has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Galaxy A50, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 7500 mAh battery versus 4000 mAh, and a 144 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 25 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 25 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and 90W charging. Samsung Galaxy A50, however, is around $414 cheaper, lighter at 166 g versus 211 g, and thinner at 7.7 mm versus 8.15 mm. The main trade-off is the X500’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the Galaxy A50’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
