Samsung Galaxy A50
$350
Samsung Galaxy A50 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| Galaxy A50 | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 350 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 100 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.4" • Super AMOLED • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 25MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 25MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 9 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 349 cheaper
Galaxy A50USD 350
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
2× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A506 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vsGalaxy A50128 GB
Battery
58% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsGalaxy A504,000 mAh
Charging
85 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsGalaxy A5015 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A50Samsung Exynos 9610
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
Larger185Hz
F9 Pro6.59″ · 185Hz
vsGalaxy A506.4″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy A50
Much lower purchase priceUSD 350
Smaller 6.4-inch display6.4″
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.59″ · 185Hz
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A50 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Galaxy A50, with 12 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 4000 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 25 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 25 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and 100W charging. Samsung Galaxy A50, however, is around $349 cheaper, lighter at 166 g versus 206 g, and thinner at 7.7 mm versus 8.79 mm. The main trade-off is the F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the Galaxy A50’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
