Samsung Galaxy A50
$350
Samsung Galaxy A50 vs Motorola Moto G53
Motorola Moto G53
$265
| Galaxy A50 | Moto G53 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 350 | USD 265 |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 18 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 9610 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G |
| Display | 6.4" • Super AMOLED • 60Hz | 6.5" • IPS LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 25MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 25MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 9 | Android 13 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 85 cheaper
Moto G53USD 265
vsGalaxy A50USD 350
RAM
2 GB more RAM
Moto G538 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A506 GB RAM
Battery
25% larger battery
Moto G535,000 mAh
vsGalaxy A504,000 mAh
Charging
3 W faster wired charging
Moto G5318 W wired
vsGalaxy A5015 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A50Samsung Exynos 9610
vsMoto G53Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G
Display
120 Hz refresh
Moto G53120 Hz
vsGalaxy A5060 Hz
Build
17 g lighter
Galaxy A50166 g
vsMoto G53183 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactSamsung Galaxy A50
Lighter build166 g
Best if you want
More hardwareMotorola Moto G53
Much lower purchase priceUSD 265
More RAM8 GB RAM
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Faster wired charging18 W wired
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A50 vs Motorola Moto G53
Motorola Moto G53 offers more RAM and a larger battery than Galaxy A50, with 8 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 4000 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 25 MP). Samsung Galaxy A50, however, is lighter at 166 g versus 183 g and thinner at 7.7 mm versus 8.19 mm and has a higher-resolution 25 MP front camera. The main trade-off is Moto G53’s extra RAM, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus Galaxy A50’s lighter, thinner build and higher-resolution front camera.
