Samsung Galaxy A50
$350
Samsung Galaxy A50 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 256GB
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 256GB
$299
| Galaxy A50 | Redmi Note 15 256GB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 350 | USD 299 |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 15 | 33 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 9610 | MediaTek Helio G100-Ultra |
| Display | 6.4" • Super AMOLED • 60Hz | 6.77" • AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 25MP | 108MP |
| Front Camera | 25MP | 20MP |
| OS | Android 9 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 51 cheaper
Redmi Note 15 256GBUSD 299
vsGalaxy A50USD 350
RAM
2 GB more RAM
Redmi Note 15 256GB8 GB RAM
vsGalaxy A506 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
Redmi Note 15 256GB256 GB
vsGalaxy A50128 GB
Battery
50% larger battery
Redmi Note 15 256GB6,000 mAh
vsGalaxy A504,000 mAh
Charging
18 W faster wired charging
Redmi Note 15 256GB33 W wired
vsGalaxy A5015 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy A50Samsung Exynos 9610
vsRedmi Note 15 256GBMediaTek Helio G100-Ultra
Display
Larger120Hz
Redmi Note 15 256GB6.77″ · 120Hz
vsGalaxy A506.4″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareXiaomi Redmi Note 15 256GB
Much lower purchase priceUSD 299
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,000 mAh
Faster wired charging33 W wired
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A50 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 256GB
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 256GB has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Galaxy A50, with 8 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6000 mAh battery versus 4000 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (108 MP versus 25 MP) and 33W charging. Samsung Galaxy A50, however, is lighter at 166 g versus 183.7 g and has a higher-resolution 25 MP front camera. The main trade-off is the Redmi Note 15 256GB’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the Galaxy A50’s lighter build and higher-resolution front camera.
