Samsung Galaxy A50 vs vivo Y200 5G

close
Samsung Galaxy A50

Samsung Galaxy A50

$350

6 GB RAM 128 GB

close
vivo Y200 5G

vivo Y200 5G

$264

8 GB RAM 128 GB

Galaxy A50Y200 5G
PriceUSD 350USD 264
Battery4000 mAh4800 mAh
Charging (W)1544
RAM6 GB8 GB
Storage128 GB128 GB
ChipsetSamsung Exynos 9610Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
Display6.4" • Super AMOLED • 60Hz6.67" • AMOLED • 120Hz
Main Camera25MP64MP
Front Camera25MP16MP
OSAndroid 9Android 13

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 86 cheaper
vsGalaxy A50USD 350
RAM
2 GB more RAM
vsGalaxy A506 GB RAM
Battery
20% larger battery
vsGalaxy A504,000 mAh
Charging
29 W faster wired charging
vsGalaxy A5015 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsY200 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
Display
Larger120Hz
vsGalaxy A506.4″ · 60Hz
Build
24 g lighter
vsY200 5G190 g

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Samsung Galaxy A50

More compact
Lighter build166 g
Best if you want

vivo Y200 5G

More hardware
Much lower purchase priceUSD 264
More RAM8 GB RAM
Larger battery4,800 mAh
Faster wired charging44 W wired

What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A50 vs vivo Y200 5G

vivo Y200 5G offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Galaxy A50, with 8 GB of RAM versus 6 GB, a 4800 mAh battery versus 4000 mAh, a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz, and 44 W wired charging versus 15 W. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (64 MP versus 25 MP) and optical image stabilization on the main camera. Samsung Galaxy A50, however, is lighter at 166 g versus 190 g and has a higher-resolution 25 MP front camera. The main trade-off is Y200 5G’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus Galaxy A50’s lighter build and higher-resolution front camera.