OPPO A16K
$139
OPPO A16K vs vivo X500
vivo X500
$764
| A16K | X500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 764 |
| Battery | 4230 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 90 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G | MediaTek Dimensity 9600M |
| Display | 6.52" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 625 cheaper
A16KUSD 139
vsX500USD 764
RAM
4× more RAM
X50012 GB RAM
vsA16K3 GB RAM
Storage
8× more storage
X500256 GB
vsA16K32 GB
Battery
77% larger battery
X5007,500 mAh
vsA16K4,230 mAh
Charging
80 W faster wired charging
X50090 W wired
vsA16K10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A16KMediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G
vsX500MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
Display
144 Hz refresh
X500144 Hz
vsA16K60 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO A16K
Much lower purchase priceUSD 139
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo X500
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery7,500 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Up to 144 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about OPPO A16K vs vivo X500
vivo X500 offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than A16K, with 12 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 32 GB, a 7500 mAh battery versus 4230 mAh, and a 144 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 90W charging. OPPO A16K, however, is around $625 cheaper, lighter at 175 g versus 211 g, and thinner at 7.85 mm versus 8.15 mm. The main trade-off is the X500’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus the A16K’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
