OPPO A16K
$139
OPPO A16K vs Oppo K15
Oppo K15
$420
| A16K | K15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 420 |
| Battery | 4230 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 80 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G | MediaTek Dimensity 7360 Super |
| Display | 6.52" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED (flexible) • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 281 cheaper
A16KUSD 139
vsK15USD 420
RAM
4× more RAM
K1512 GB RAM
vsA16K3 GB RAM
Storage
8× more storage
K15256 GB
vsA16K32 GB
Battery
89% larger battery
K158,000 mAh
vsA16K4,230 mAh
Charging
70 W faster wired charging
K1580 W wired
vsA16K10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A16KMediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G
vsK15MediaTek Dimensity 7360 Super
Display
120 Hz refresh
K15120 Hz
vsA16K60 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO A16K
Much lower purchase priceUSD 139
Best if you want
More hardwareOppo K15
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about OPPO A16K vs Oppo K15
Oppo K15 offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than A16K, with 12 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 32 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 4230 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 5 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and 80W charging. OPPO A16K, however, is around $281 cheaper, lighter at 175 g versus 205 g, and thinner at 7.85 mm versus 8.27 mm. The main trade-off is K15’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus A16K’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
