OPPO A16K
$139
OPPO A16K vs Motorola Moto G47 Power
Motorola Moto G47 Power
$403
| A16K | Moto G47 Power | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 403 |
| Battery | 4230 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 30 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
| Display | 6.52" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.67" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 108MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 8MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 264 cheaper
A16KUSD 139
vsMoto G47 PowerUSD 403
RAM
1 GB more RAM
Moto G47 Power4 GB RAM
vsA16K3 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
Moto G47 Power128 GB
vsA16K32 GB
Battery
65% larger battery
Moto G47 Power7,000 mAh
vsA16K4,230 mAh
Charging
20 W faster wired charging
Moto G47 Power30 W wired
vsA16K10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A16KMediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G
vsMoto G47 PowerMediaTek Dimensity 6300
Display
Larger120Hz
Moto G47 Power6.67″ · 120Hz
vsA16K6.52″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO A16K
Much lower purchase priceUSD 139
Smaller 6.52-inch display6.52″
Best if you want
More hardwareMotorola Moto G47 Power
More RAM and storage4 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery7,000 mAh
Faster wired charging30 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.67″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about OPPO A16K vs Motorola Moto G47 Power
Motorola Moto G47 Power has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over A16K, with 4 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 32 GB, a 7000 mAh battery versus 4230 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (108 MP versus 13 MP), NFC, and 30W charging. OPPO A16K, however, is around $264 cheaper, lighter at 175 g versus 215 g, and thinner at 7.85 mm versus 8.89 mm. The choice comes down to Moto G47 Power’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus A16K’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
