Nokia 6300 4G
$69
Compare Mobiles
vivo Y32 (2026)
$251
| 6300 4G | Y32 (2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 69 | USD 251 |
| Battery | 1500 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | N/A | 44 |
| RAM | N/A | 4 GB |
| Storage | 4 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210 | UNISOC T7300 |
| Display | 2.4" • TFT LCD • 60Hz | 6.87" • LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 0.3MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 0MP | 8MP |
| OS | KaiOS 2.5 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 182 cheaper
6300 4GUSD 69
vsY32 (2026)USD 251
RAM
4 GB more RAM
Y32 (2026)4 GB RAM
vs6300 4G0 GB RAM
Storage
32× more storage
Y32 (2026)128 GB
vs6300 4G4 GB
Battery
433% larger battery
Y32 (2026)8,000 mAh
vs6300 4G1,500 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
6300 4GQualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210
vsY32 (2026)UNISOC T7300
Display
Larger120Hz
Y32 (2026)6.87″ · 120Hz
vs6300 4G2.4″ · 60Hz
Build
124 g lighter
6300 4G104.7 g
vsY32 (2026)229 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceNokia 6300 4G
Much lower purchase priceUSD 69
Lighter build104.7 g
Smaller 2.4-inch display2.4″
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo Y32 (2026)
More RAM and storage4 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery8,000 mAh
Larger 120Hz display6.87″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Nokia 6300 4G vs vivo Y32 (2026)
vivo Y32 (2026) offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than 6300 4G, with 4 GB of RAM versus 0.5 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 4 GB, a 8000 mAh battery versus 1500 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 0.3 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (8 MP versus 0 MP), and NFC. Nokia 6300 4G, however, is around $182 cheaper and lighter at 104.7 g versus 229 g. The choice comes down to Y32 (2026)’s extra RAM, storage, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution cameras versus 6300 4G’s lower price and lighter build.
