Nokia 6300 4G
$69
Nokia 6300 4G vs vivo S2 FE
vivo S2 FE
$410
| 6300 4G | S2 FE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 69 | USD 410 |
| Battery | 1500 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | N/A | 44 |
| RAM | N/A | 6 GB |
| Storage | 4 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300e |
| Display | 2.4" • TFT LCD • 60Hz | 6.83" • AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 0.3MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 0MP | 32MP |
| OS | KaiOS 2.5 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 341 cheaper
6300 4GUSD 69
vsS2 FEUSD 410
RAM
6 GB more RAM
S2 FE6 GB RAM
vs6300 4G0 GB RAM
Storage
32× more storage
S2 FE128 GB
vs6300 4G4 GB
Battery
567% larger battery
S2 FE10,000 mAh
vs6300 4G1,500 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
6300 4GQualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210
vsS2 FEMediaTek Dimensity 7300e
Display
Larger120Hz
S2 FE6.83″ · 120Hz
vs6300 4G2.4″ · 60Hz
Build
119 g lighter
6300 4G104.7 g
vsS2 FE224 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceNokia 6300 4G
Much lower purchase priceUSD 69
Lighter build104.7 g
Smaller 2.4-inch display2.4″
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo S2 FE
More RAM and storage6 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery10,000 mAh
Larger 120Hz display6.83″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Nokia 6300 4G vs vivo S2 FE
vivo S2 FE has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over 6300 4G, with 6 GB of RAM versus 0.5 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 4 GB, a 10000 mAh battery versus 1500 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 0.3 MP) and a higher-resolution front camera (32 MP versus 0 MP). Nokia 6300 4G, however, is around $341 cheaper and lighter at 104.7 g versus 224 g. The main trade-off is S2 FE’s extra RAM, storage, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution cameras versus 6300 4G’s lower price and lighter build.
