Nokia 6300 4G
$69
Nokia 6300 4G vs ZTE Nubia A36
ZTE Nubia A36
$65
| 6300 4G | Nubia A36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 69 | USD 65 |
| Battery | 1500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | N/A | 10 |
| RAM | N/A | 4 GB |
| Storage | 4 GB | 64 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210 | Unisoc T606 |
| Display | 2.4" • TFT LCD • 60Hz | 6.75" • IPS LCD • 90Hz |
| Main Camera | 0.3MP | 13MP |
| Front Camera | 0MP | 5MP |
| OS | KaiOS 2.5 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 4 cheaper
Nubia A36USD 65
vs6300 4GUSD 69
RAM
4 GB more RAM
Nubia A364 GB RAM
vs6300 4G0 GB RAM
Storage
16× more storage
Nubia A3664 GB
vs6300 4G4 GB
Battery
233% larger battery
Nubia A365,000 mAh
vs6300 4G1,500 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
6300 4GQualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210
vsNubia A36Unisoc T606
Display
Larger90Hz
Nubia A366.75″ · 90Hz
vs6300 4G2.4″ · 60Hz
Build
87 g lighter
6300 4G104.7 g
vsNubia A36192 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactNokia 6300 4G
Lighter build104.7 g
Best if you want
More hardwareZTE Nubia A36
Much lower purchase priceUSD 65
More RAM and storage4 GB RAM · 64 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Larger 90Hz display6.75″ · 90Hz
What CompareTab says about Nokia 6300 4G vs ZTE Nubia A36
ZTE Nubia A36 has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over 6300 4G, with 4 GB of RAM versus 0.5 GB, 64 GB of storage versus 4 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 1500 mAh, and a 90 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (13 MP versus 0.3 MP) and a higher-resolution front camera (5 MP versus 0 MP). Nokia 6300 4G, however, is lighter at 104.7 g versus 192 g. The main trade-off is Nubia A36’s extra RAM, storage, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution cameras versus 6300 4G’s lighter build.
