Nokia 6300 4G
$69
Nokia 6300 4G vs Sparx S9
Sparx S9
$41
| 6300 4G | S9 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 69 | USD 41 |
| Battery | 1500 mAh | 3250 mAh |
| Charging (W) | N/A | N/A |
| RAM | N/A | 2 GB |
| Storage | 4 GB | 32 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210 | Unisoc SC9832E |
| Display | 2.4" • TFT LCD • 60Hz | 6.1" • IPS LCD • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 0.3MP | 13MP |
| Front Camera | 0MP | 5MP |
| OS | KaiOS 2.5 | Android 12 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 28 cheaper
S9USD 41
vs6300 4GUSD 69
RAM
2 GB more RAM
S92 GB RAM
vs6300 4G0 GB RAM
Storage
8× more storage
S932 GB
vs6300 4G4 GB
Battery
117% larger battery
S93,250 mAh
vs6300 4G1,500 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
6300 4GQualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210
vsS9Unisoc SC9832E
Display
Larger display
S96.1-inch
vs6300 4G2.4-inch
Camera
Higher resolution
S913MP rear · 5MP front
vs6300 4G0MP rear · 0MP front
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareSparx S9
Much lower purchase priceUSD 41
More RAM and storage2 GB RAM · 32 GB
Larger battery3,250 mAh
Larger 6.1-inch6.1-inch
What CompareTab says about Nokia 6300 4G vs Sparx S9
Sparx S9 offers more RAM, storage and a larger battery than 6300 4G, with 2 GB of RAM versus 0.5 GB, 32 GB of storage versus 4 GB, a 3250 mAh battery versus 1500 mAh, and a 6.1 inch display versus 2.4 inch. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (13 MP versus 0.3 MP) and a higher-resolution front camera (5 MP versus 0 MP).
