Nokia 6300 4G
$69
Nokia 6300 4G vs Vivo Y12s
Vivo Y12s
$140
| 6300 4G | Y12s | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 69 | USD 140 |
| Battery | 1500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | N/A | 10 |
| RAM | N/A | 3 GB |
| Storage | 4 GB | 32 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210 | MediaTek Helio P35 |
| Display | 2.4" • TFT LCD • 60Hz | 6.51" • IPS LCD • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 0.3MP | 13MP |
| Front Camera | 0MP | 8MP |
| OS | KaiOS 2.5 | Android 10 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 71 cheaper
6300 4GUSD 69
vsY12sUSD 140
RAM
3 GB more RAM
Y12s3 GB RAM
vs6300 4G0 GB RAM
Storage
8× more storage
Y12s32 GB
vs6300 4G4 GB
Battery
233% larger battery
Y12s5,000 mAh
vs6300 4G1,500 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
6300 4GQualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210
vsY12sMediaTek Helio P35
Display
Larger display
Y12s6.51-inch
vs6300 4G2.4-inch
Build
86 g lighter
6300 4G104.7 g
vsY12s191 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceNokia 6300 4G
Much lower purchase priceUSD 69
Lighter build104.7 g
Smaller 2.4-inch display2.4″
Best if you want
More hardwareVivo Y12s
More RAM and storage3 GB RAM · 32 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Larger 6.51-inch6.51-inch
What CompareTab says about Nokia 6300 4G vs Vivo Y12s
Vivo Y12s offers more RAM, storage and a larger battery than 6300 4G, with 3 GB of RAM versus 0.5 GB, 32 GB of storage versus 4 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 1500 mAh, and a 6.51 inch display versus 2.4 inch. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (13 MP versus 0.3 MP) and a higher-resolution front camera (8 MP versus 0 MP). Nokia 6300 4G, however, is around $71.00 cheaper and lighter at 104.7 g versus 191 g. The choice comes down to Y12s’s extra RAM, storage, battery capacity, larger display, and higher-resolution cameras versus 6300 4G’s lower price and lighter build.
