Samsung Galaxy M52
$399
Samsung Galaxy M52 vs vivo X500
vivo X500
$764
| Galaxy M52 | X500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 399 | USD 764 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 90 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G | MediaTek Dimensity 9600M |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED Plus • 120Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 365 cheaper
Galaxy M52USD 399
vsX500USD 764
RAM
4 GB more RAM
X50012 GB RAM
vsGalaxy M528 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
X500256 GB
vsGalaxy M52128 GB
Battery
50% larger battery
X5007,500 mAh
vsGalaxy M525,000 mAh
Charging
65 W faster wired charging
X50090 W wired
vsGalaxy M5225 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy M52Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
vsX500MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
Display
144 Hz refresh
X500144 Hz
vsGalaxy M52120 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy M52
Much lower purchase priceUSD 399
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo X500
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery7,500 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Up to 144 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy M52 vs vivo X500
vivo X500 offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than Galaxy M52, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 7500 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 144 Hz display instead of 120 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 32 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, a telephoto rear camera, and 90W charging. Samsung Galaxy M52, however, is around $365 cheaper, lighter at 173 g versus 211 g, and thinner at 7.4 mm versus 8.15 mm. The choice comes down to X500’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Galaxy M52’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
