Samsung Galaxy M52 vs Samsung Galaxy F35 5G

close
Samsung Galaxy M52

Samsung Galaxy M52

$399

8 GB RAM 128 GB

close
Samsung Galaxy F35 5G

Samsung Galaxy F35 5G

$299

8 GB RAM 256 GB

Galaxy M52Galaxy F35 5G
PriceUSD 399USD 299
Battery5000 mAh6000 mAh
Charging (W)2525
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage128 GB256 GB
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5GSamsung Exynos 1380
Display6.7" • Super AMOLED Plus • 120Hz6.6" • Super AMOLED • 120Hz
Main Camera64MP50MP
Front Camera32MP13MP
OSAndroid 11Android 14

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 100 cheaper
vsGalaxy M52USD 399
Storage
2× more storage
vsGalaxy M52128 GB
Battery
20% larger battery
vsGalaxy M525,000 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
vsGalaxy F35 5GSamsung Exynos 1380
Build
49 g lighter
vsGalaxy F35 5G222 g
Camera
Higher resolution
vsGalaxy F35 5G50MP rear · 13MP front
Build
More compact thickness
vsGalaxy F35 5G9.1 mm

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Samsung Galaxy M52

More compact
Lighter build173 g
Higher-resolution cameras64MP rear · 32MP front
Thinner body7.4 mm
Best if you want

Samsung Galaxy F35 5G

More hardware
Much lower purchase priceUSD 299
More storage256 GB
Larger battery6,000 mAh

What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy M52 vs Samsung Galaxy F35 5G

Samsung Galaxy F35 5G offers more storage than Galaxy M52, with 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB and a 6000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh. It also adds optical image stabilization on the main camera. Samsung Galaxy M52, however, is lighter at 173 g versus 222 g and thinner at 7.4 mm versus 9.1 mm and has a higher-resolution 32 MP front camera. The choice comes down to Galaxy F35 5G’s storage, battery capacity, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus Galaxy M52’s lighter, thinner build and higher-resolution front camera.