Samsung Galaxy M52
$399
Samsung Galaxy M52 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| Galaxy M52 | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 399 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED Plus • 120Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 300 cheaper
Galaxy M52USD 399
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
4 GB more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy M528 GB RAM
Storage
2× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vsGalaxy M52128 GB
Battery
27% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vsGalaxy M525,000 mAh
Charging
75 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vsGalaxy M5225 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy M52Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
185 Hz refresh
F9 Pro185 Hz
vsGalaxy M52120 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy M52
Much lower purchase priceUSD 399
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Up to 185 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy M52 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Galaxy M52, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 120 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 64 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, a telephoto rear camera, and 100W charging. Samsung Galaxy M52, however, is around $300 cheaper, lighter at 173 g versus 206 g, and thinner at 7.4 mm versus 8.79 mm. The main trade-off is F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus Galaxy M52’s lower price and lighter, thinner build.
