OPPO Reno 12F
$216
OPPO Reno 12F vs Samsung Galaxy M52
Samsung Galaxy M52
$399
| Reno 12F | Galaxy M52 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 216 | USD 399 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 25 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Display | 6.67" • Rigid AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.7" • Super AMOLED Plus • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 64MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 183 cheaper
Reno 12FUSD 216
vsGalaxy M52USD 399
Storage
2× more storage
Reno 12F256 GB
vsGalaxy M52128 GB
Charging
20 W faster wired charging
Reno 12F45 W wired
vsGalaxy M5225 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Reno 12FQualcomm Snapdragon 685
vsGalaxy M52Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
Build
14 g lighter
Galaxy M52173 g
vsReno 12F187 g
Camera
Higher-resolution main camera
Galaxy M5264MP rear
vsReno 12F50MP rear
Connectivity
Adds 5G
Galaxy M525G
vsReno 12FNo 5G listed
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO Reno 12F
Much lower purchase priceUSD 216
More storage256 GB
Faster wired charging45 W wired
Best if you want
More compactSamsung Galaxy M52
Lighter build173 g
Higher-resolution main camera64MP rear
5G connectivity5G
What CompareTab says about OPPO Reno 12F vs Samsung Galaxy M52
OPPO Reno 12F offers more storage than Galaxy M52, with 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB and 45 W wired charging versus 25 W. Samsung Galaxy M52, however, is lighter at 173 g versus 187 g. The choice comes down to Reno 12F’s storage and faster charging versus Galaxy M52’s lighter build.
