Samsung Galaxy M52
$399
Samsung Galaxy M52 vs OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
$325
| Galaxy M52 | A7 Pro Max 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 399 | USD 325 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 80 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 |
| Display | 6.7" • Super AMOLED Plus • 120Hz | 6.78" • Flexible AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 64MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 74 cheaper
A7 Pro Max 5GUSD 325
vsGalaxy M52USD 399
Storage
2× more storage
A7 Pro Max 5G256 GB
vsGalaxy M52128 GB
Battery
100% larger battery
A7 Pro Max 5G10,000 mAh
vsGalaxy M525,000 mAh
Charging
55 W faster wired charging
A7 Pro Max 5G80 W wired
vsGalaxy M5225 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy M52Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
vsA7 Pro Max 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5
Build
51 g lighter
Galaxy M52173 g
vsA7 Pro Max 5G224 g
Camera
Higher-resolution main camera
Galaxy M5264MP rear
vsA7 Pro Max 5G50MP rear
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More compactSamsung Galaxy M52
Lighter build173 g
Higher-resolution main camera64MP rear
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
Much lower purchase priceUSD 325
More storage256 GB
Larger battery10,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy M52 vs OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G offers more storage than Galaxy M52, with 256 GB of storage versus 128 GB, a 10000 mAh battery versus 5000 mAh, and 80 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 32 MP) and optical image stabilization on the main camera. Samsung Galaxy M52, however, is lighter at 173 g versus 224 g and thinner at 7.4 mm versus 8.57 mm. The main trade-off is A7 Pro Max 5G’s storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus Galaxy M52’s lighter, thinner build.
