Samsung Galaxy M35
$293
Samsung Galaxy M35 vs vivo S60t
vivo S60t
$540
| Galaxy M35 | S60t | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 293 | USD 540 |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7200 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 25 | 90 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| Display | 6.6" • Super AMOLED • 120Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 144Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 17 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 247 cheaper
Galaxy M35USD 293
vsS60tUSD 540
RAM
4 GB more RAM
S60t12 GB RAM
vsGalaxy M358 GB RAM
Battery
20% larger battery
S60t7,200 mAh
vsGalaxy M356,000 mAh
Charging
65 W faster wired charging
S60t90 W wired
vsGalaxy M3525 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
Galaxy M35Samsung Exynos 1380
vsS60tQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
Display
144 Hz refresh
S60t144 Hz
vsGalaxy M35120 Hz
Build
15 g lighter
S60t207 g
vsGalaxy M35222 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceSamsung Galaxy M35
Much lower purchase priceUSD 293
Best if you want
More hardwarevivo S60t
More RAM12 GB RAM
Larger battery7,200 mAh
Faster wired charging90 W wired
Up to 144 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy M35 vs vivo S60t
vivo S60t offers more RAM and faster wired charging than Galaxy M35, with 12 GB of RAM versus 8 GB, a 7200 mAh battery versus 6000 mAh, a 144 Hz display instead of 120 Hz, and 90 W wired charging versus 25 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 13 MP) and a telephoto rear camera. Samsung Galaxy M35, however, is around $247 cheaper. The choice comes down to S60t’s extra RAM, faster charging, battery capacity, smoother display, and camera features versus Galaxy M35’s lower price.
