Samsung Galaxy A03 Core vs Nokia 6300 4G

close
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core

Samsung Galaxy A03 Core

$107

2 GB RAM 32 GB

close
Nokia 6300 4G

Nokia 6300 4G

$69

0 GB RAM 4 GB

Galaxy A03 Core6300 4G
PriceUSD 107USD 69
Battery5000 mAh1500 mAh
Charging (W)10N/A
RAM2 GBN/A
Storage32 GB4 GB
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863AQualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210
Display6.5" • PLS TFT LCD • 60Hz2.4" • TFT LCD • 60Hz
Main Camera8MP0.3MP
Front Camera5MP0MP
OSAndroid 11 Go EditionKaiOS 2.5

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 38 cheaper
vsGalaxy A03 CoreUSD 107
RAM
2 GB more RAM
vs6300 4G0 GB RAM
Storage
8× more storage
vs6300 4G4 GB
Battery
233% larger battery
vs6300 4G1,500 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
vs6300 4GQualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210
Display
Larger display
vs6300 4G2.4-inch
Build
106 g lighter
vsGalaxy A03 Core211 g

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Samsung Galaxy A03 Core

More hardware
More RAM and storage2 GB RAM · 32 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Larger 6.5-inch6.5-inch
Best if you want

Nokia 6300 4G

Lower price
Much lower purchase priceUSD 69
Lighter build104.7 g
Smaller 2.4-inch display2.4″

What CompareTab says about Samsung Galaxy A03 Core vs Nokia 6300 4G

Samsung Galaxy A03 Core offers more RAM, storage and a larger battery than 6300 4G, with 2 GB of RAM versus 0.5 GB, 32 GB of storage versus 4 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 1500 mAh, and a 6.5 inch display versus 2.4 inch. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (5 MP versus 0 MP). Nokia 6300 4G, however, is cheaper at around $69 versus $107 and lighter at 104.7 g versus 211 g. The main trade-off is Galaxy A03 Core’s extra RAM, storage, battery capacity, larger display, and higher-resolution front camera versus 6300 4G’s lower price and lighter build.