POCO C65
$129
POCO C65 vs Realme Narzo 50
Realme Narzo 50
$205
| C65 | Narzo 50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 129 | USD 205 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | 33 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Helio G96 |
| Display | 6.74" • IPS LCD • 90Hz | 6.6" • IPS LCD • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 16MP |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 11 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 76 cheaper
C65USD 129
vsNarzo 50USD 205
Charging
15 W faster wired charging
Narzo 5033 W wired
vsC6518 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
C65MediaTek Helio G85
vsNarzo 50MediaTek Helio G96
Display
120 Hz refresh
Narzo 50120 Hz
vsC6590 Hz
Build
More compact thickness
C658.09 mm
vsNarzo 508.5 mm
Camera
Higher-resolution front camera
Narzo 5016MP front
vsC658MP front
Connectivity
Adds NFC
C65NFC
vsNarzo 50No NFC listed
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower pricePOCO C65
Much lower purchase priceUSD 129
Thinner body8.09 mm
NFCNFC
Best if you want
More hardwareRealme Narzo 50
Faster wired charging33 W wired
Up to 120 Hz display6.6-inch
Higher-resolution front camera16MP front
What CompareTab says about POCO C65 vs Realme Narzo 50
Realme Narzo 50 has the larger display and faster wired charging than C65, with a 120 Hz display instead of 90 Hz and 33 W wired charging versus 18 W. It also adds a higher-resolution front camera (16 MP versus 8 MP). POCO C65, however, is around $76.00 cheaper and thinner at 8.09 mm versus 8.5 mm and has higher quoted peak brightness at 600 nits versus 480 nits. The main trade-off is the Narzo 50’s faster charging, smoother display, and higher-resolution front camera versus the C65’s lower price, higher quoted peak brightness, and thinner body.
