POCO C65
$129
POCO C65 vs Acer Liquid M220
Acer Liquid M220
$80
| C65 | Liquid M220 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 129 | USD 80 |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 1300 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 18 | N/A |
| RAM | 6 GB | 1 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB | 8 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | Qualcomm MSM8210 Snapdragon 200 |
| Display | 6.74" • IPS LCD • 90Hz | 4" • TFT LCD • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 50MP | 5MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP | 2MP |
| OS | Android 13 | Windows Phone 8.1 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 49.01 cheaper
Liquid M220USD 79.99
vsC65USD 129
RAM
6× more RAM
C656 GB RAM
vsLiquid M2201 GB RAM
Storage
16× more storage
C65128 GB
vsLiquid M2208 GB
Battery
285% larger battery
C655,000 mAh
vsLiquid M2201,300 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
C65MediaTek Helio G85
vsLiquid M220Qualcomm MSM8210 Snapdragon 200
Display
Larger90Hz
C656.74″ · 90Hz
vsLiquid M2204″ · 60Hz
Build
73 g lighter
Liquid M220119 g
vsC65192 g
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO C65
More RAM and storage6 GB RAM · 128 GB
Larger battery5,000 mAh
Larger 90Hz display6.74″ · 90Hz
Best if you want
Lower priceAcer Liquid M220
Much lower purchase priceUSD 79.99
Lighter build119 g
Smaller 4-inch display4″
What CompareTab says about POCO C65 vs Acer Liquid M220
POCO C65 has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over Liquid M220, with 6 GB of RAM versus 1 GB, 128 GB of storage versus 8 GB, a 5000 mAh battery versus 1300 mAh, and a 90 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 5 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (8 MP versus 2 MP), and NFC. Acer Liquid M220, however, is cheaper at around $79.99 versus $129 and lighter at 119 g versus 192 g. The main trade-off is the C65’s extra RAM, storage, battery capacity, smoother display, and higher-resolution cameras versus the Liquid M220’s lower price and lighter build.
