OPPO A16K
$139
OPPO A16K vs Nokia 8110 4G
Nokia 8110 4G
$89
| A16K | 8110 4G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 89 |
| Battery | 4230 mAh | 1500 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 2.75 |
| RAM | 3 GB | N/A |
| Storage | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G | Qualcomm 205 Mobile Platform MSM8905 |
| Display | 6.52" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 2.45" • TFT LCD • 60Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 2MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 0MP |
| OS | Android 11 | KaiOS 2.5 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 50 cheaper
8110 4GUSD 89
vsA16KUSD 139
RAM
3 GB more RAM
A16K3 GB RAM
vs8110 4G0 GB RAM
Storage
8× more storage
A16K32 GB
vs8110 4G4 GB
Battery
182% larger battery
A16K4,230 mAh
vs8110 4G1,500 mAh
Charging
7 W faster wired charging
A16K10 W wired
vs8110 4G3 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A16KMediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G
vs8110 4GQualcomm 205 Mobile Platform MSM8905
Display
Larger display
A16K6.52-inch
vs8110 4G2.45-inch
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO A16K
More RAM and storage3 GB RAM · 32 GB
Larger battery4,230 mAh
Faster wired charging10 W wired
Larger 6.52-inch6.52-inch
Best if you want
Lower priceNokia 8110 4G
Much lower purchase priceUSD 89
Smaller 2.45-inch display2.45″
What CompareTab says about OPPO A16K vs Nokia 8110 4G
OPPO A16K offers more RAM, storage and a larger battery than 8110 4G, with 3 GB of RAM versus 0.5 GB, 32 GB of storage versus 4 GB, a 4230 mAh battery versus 1500 mAh, and a 6.52 inch display versus 2.45 inch. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (13 MP versus 2 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (5 MP versus 0 MP), and 10W charging. Nokia 8110 4G, however, is around $50.00 cheaper and lighter at 117 g versus 175 g. The main trade-off is the A16K’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and larger display versus the 8110 4G’s lower price and lighter build.
