OPPO A16K
$139
OPPO A16K vs Oppo Reno 13 Pro
Oppo Reno 13 Pro
$649
| A16K | Reno 13 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 649 |
| Battery | 4230 mAh | 5800 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 10 | 80 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 512 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 |
| Display | 6.52" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.83" • Flexible AMOLED Infinite View Screen • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 15 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 510 cheaper
A16KUSD 139
vsReno 13 ProUSD 649
RAM
4× more RAM
Reno 13 Pro12 GB RAM
vsA16K3 GB RAM
Storage
16× more storage
Reno 13 Pro512 GB
vsA16K32 GB
Battery
37% larger battery
Reno 13 Pro5,800 mAh
vsA16K4,230 mAh
Charging
70 W faster wired charging
Reno 13 Pro80 W wired
vsA16K10 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
A16KMediaTek Helio G35 MT6765G
vsReno 13 ProMediaTek Dimensity 8350
Display
Larger120Hz
Reno 13 Pro6.83″ · 120Hz
vsA16K6.52″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceOPPO A16K
Much lower purchase priceUSD 139
Smaller 6.52-inch display6.52″
Best if you want
More hardwareOppo Reno 13 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 512 GB
Larger battery5,800 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.83″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about OPPO A16K vs Oppo Reno 13 Pro
Oppo Reno 13 Pro offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than A16K, with 12 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 512 GB of storage versus 32 GB, a 5800 mAh battery versus 4230 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 80W charging. OPPO A16K, however, is around $510 cheaper and lighter at 175 g versus 195 g. The main trade-off is Reno 13 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus A16K’s lower price and lighter build.
