Nokia 6300 4G vs POCO F9 Pro

close
Nokia 6300 4G

Nokia 6300 4G

$69

0 GB RAM 4 GB

close
POCO F9 Pro

POCO F9 Pro

$699

12 GB RAM 256 GB

6300 4GF9 Pro
PriceUSD 69USD 699
Battery1500 mAh6330 mAh
Charging (W)N/A100
RAMN/A12 GB
Storage4 GB256 GB
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display2.4" • TFT LCD • 60Hz6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz
Main Camera0.3MP200MP
Front Camera0MP32MP
OSKaiOS 2.5Android 16

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 630 cheaper
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
12 GB more RAM
vs6300 4G0 GB RAM
Storage
64× more storage
vs6300 4G4 GB
Battery
322% larger battery
vs6300 4G1,500 mAh
Performance
Different chipsets
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
Larger185Hz
vs6300 4G2.4″ · 60Hz
Build
101 g lighter
vsF9 Pro206 g

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Nokia 6300 4G

Lower price
Much lower purchase priceUSD 69
Lighter build104.7 g
Smaller 2.4-inch display2.4″
Best if you want

POCO F9 Pro

More hardware
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Larger 185Hz display6.59″ · 185Hz

What CompareTab says about Nokia 6300 4G vs POCO F9 Pro

POCO F9 Pro has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over 6300 4G, with 12 GB of RAM versus 0.5 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 4 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 1500 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 0.3 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and an ultrawide rear camera. Nokia 6300 4G, however, is around $630 cheaper and lighter at 104.7 g versus 206 g. The main trade-off is F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, battery capacity, smoother display, and OIS-equipped camera setup versus 6300 4G’s lower price and lighter build.