Nokia 2.4 vs POCO F9 Ultra

close
Nokia 2.4

Nokia 2.4

$139

3 GB RAM 64 GB

close
POCO F9 Ultra

POCO F9 Ultra

$799

12 GB RAM 256 GB

2.4F9 Ultra
PriceUSD 139USD 799
Battery4500 mAh8050 mAh
Charging (W)5100
RAM3 GB12 GB
Storage64 GB256 GB
ChipsetMediaTek Helio P22 MT6762Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC)
Display6.5" • IPS LCD • 60Hz6.9" • AMOLED • 185Hz
Main Camera13MP200MP
Front Camera5MP32MP
OSAndroid 10Android 16

Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.

Key Differences

Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.

Price
USD 660 cheaper
vsF9 UltraUSD 799
RAM
4× more RAM
vs2.43 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
vs2.464 GB
Battery
79% larger battery
vs2.44,500 mAh
Charging
95 W faster wired charging
vs2.45 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
vsF9 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (SM8850-AC)
Display
Larger185Hz
vs2.46.5″ · 60Hz

Best For

Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.

Best if you want

Nokia 2.4

Lower price
Much lower purchase priceUSD 139
Smaller 6.5-inch display6.5″
Best if you want

POCO F9 Ultra

More hardware
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery8,050 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Larger 185Hz display6.9″ · 185Hz

What CompareTab says about Nokia 2.4 vs POCO F9 Ultra

POCO F9 Ultra offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than 2.4, with 12 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 8050 mAh battery versus 4500 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 13 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. Nokia 2.4, however, is around $660 cheaper and lighter at 189 g versus 235 g. The choice comes down to F9 Ultra’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus 2.4’s lower price and lighter build.