Nokia 2.4
$139
Nokia 2.4 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro
$699
| 2.4 | F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 699 |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 6330 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 5 | 100 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB) |
| Display | 6.5" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.59" • AMOLED • 185Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 200MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 32MP |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 560 cheaper
2.4USD 139
vsF9 ProUSD 699
RAM
4× more RAM
F9 Pro12 GB RAM
vs2.43 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
F9 Pro256 GB
vs2.464 GB
Battery
41% larger battery
F9 Pro6,330 mAh
vs2.44,500 mAh
Charging
95 W faster wired charging
F9 Pro100 W wired
vs2.45 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
2.4MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762
vsF9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (SM8850-1-AB)
Display
185 Hz refresh
F9 Pro185 Hz
vs2.460 Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceNokia 2.4
Much lower purchase priceUSD 139
Best if you want
More hardwarePOCO F9 Pro
More RAM and storage12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery6,330 mAh
Faster wired charging100 W wired
Up to 185 Hz display6.59-inch
What CompareTab says about Nokia 2.4 vs POCO F9 Pro
POCO F9 Pro offers more RAM, storage, battery capacity and a smoother display than 2.4, with 12 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 6330 mAh battery versus 4500 mAh, and a 185 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (200 MP versus 13 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, an ultrawide rear camera, and 100W charging. Nokia 2.4, however, is around $560 cheaper and lighter at 189 g versus 206 g. The choice comes down to F9 Pro’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus 2.4’s lower price and lighter build.
