Nokia 2.4
$139
Nokia 2.4 vs OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
$325
| 2.4 | A7 Pro Max 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | USD 139 | USD 325 |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Charging (W) | 5 | 80 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 |
| Display | 6.5" • IPS LCD • 60Hz | 6.78" • Flexible AMOLED • 120Hz |
| Main Camera | 13MP | 50MP |
| Front Camera | 5MP | 50MP |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 |
Detailed comparison will load when you open this tab.
Key Differences
Only the differences that meaningfully separate these phones.
Price
USD 186 cheaper
2.4USD 139
vsA7 Pro Max 5GUSD 325
RAM
5 GB more RAM
A7 Pro Max 5G8 GB RAM
vs2.43 GB RAM
Storage
4× more storage
A7 Pro Max 5G256 GB
vs2.464 GB
Battery
122% larger battery
A7 Pro Max 5G10,000 mAh
vs2.44,500 mAh
Charging
75 W faster wired charging
A7 Pro Max 5G80 W wired
vs2.45 W wired
Performance
Different chipsets
2.4MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762
vsA7 Pro Max 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5
Display
Larger120Hz
A7 Pro Max 5G6.78″ · 120Hz
vs2.46.5″ · 60Hz
Best For
Where each phone stands out based on this comparison.
Best if you want
Lower priceNokia 2.4
Much lower purchase priceUSD 139
Smaller 6.5-inch display6.5″
Best if you want
More hardwareOPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
More RAM and storage8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Larger battery10,000 mAh
Faster wired charging80 W wired
Larger 120Hz display6.78″ · 120Hz
What CompareTab says about Nokia 2.4 vs OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G
OPPO A7 Pro Max 5G has clear advantages in memory, battery capacity and display refresh rate over 2.4, with 8 GB of RAM versus 3 GB, 256 GB of storage versus 64 GB, a 10000 mAh battery versus 4500 mAh, and a 120 Hz display instead of 60 Hz. It also adds a higher-resolution rear camera (50 MP versus 13 MP), a higher-resolution front camera (50 MP versus 5 MP), optical image stabilization on the main camera, and 80W charging. Nokia 2.4, however, is around $186 cheaper and lighter at 189 g versus 224 g. The choice comes down to A7 Pro Max 5G’s extra RAM, storage, faster charging, battery capacity, and smoother display versus 2.4’s lower price and lighter build.
